Fascynaci planszówek - łączcie się!
https://www.gry-planszowe.pl/
ostatecznie tak, choć jak strzelałeś to w planie było ogłoszenie innej gry8janek8 pisze:Czyli dobrze trafiłem z 3 tytułem:)
Powoli - jeszcze podstawka nie ruszyłaagulanka pisze:A co z dodatkami? Tez beda wydane? Wiem ze poki co jest jeden, ale watpie zeby na tym sie skonczylo...
.
Moja wersja z Rio Grande Games jest od początku prawie w 100% spolszczona. Dodatek kupiłem na pniu.mauserem pisze:No pięknie! To jak teraz wyceniacie swoje obcojęzyczne wersje RollFTG ?
Wy wiecie oczywiście ze wersja Rio Grande to chiński plastik (kości, kubki, drewnionae ludziki) a karton był "Proudly made in USA"...Rafal_Kruczek pisze: http://wspieramto.znadplanszy.pl/2015/1 ... ski/[quote]
Rzecz najważniejsza: termin dostawy ustalamy na marzec 2016. Całość produkcji odbędzie się w Niemczech, jakość gry będzie tożsama z kopiami które są dostępne na rynku w tej chwili.
Curiosity pisze:Skoro podstawka w marcu, to kiedy dodatek?
Pamietaj o mnie!adikom5777 pisze:Za kilka dni w sklepach
Zawsze można laminowaćmikeyoski pisze:A jest szansa na lepszej jakości plansze gracza? Te oryginalne są słabe
) wywolala mala goraczke wsrod ludzi (takich jak ja) ktorzy Race'a szanuja i z ciekawoscia przygladali sie nowemu dziecku Huang i Lehmanna. Sam mam pelny pierwszy arc Race'a i duzy opor przed kupowaniem Rolla ale GFP ustawil cene w taki sposob, ze pokusa jest.entranced pisze: 9 plays - 8: Still don't really know what i'm doing, bumbling through the game. Enjoyable so far, but should get a lot better with more plays.
Not yet really paying attention to what specific cards opponents have, just trying to manage my pool of dice and cards into some semblance of a strategy.
49 plays - 9.5: the rabbit hole deepens, and deepens. I still feel like i've only discovered the tip of the iceberg. My winrate is absurdly good, yet i still feel lost as to what the optimal play is in most/all spots.
Still don't know how to play engines very well. Mastered dev spam. Don't like worlds anymore.
Very enjoyable, getting close to a 10, but not quite there yet.
136 plays - 6: Explore Big Dev and Dev Spam seem to dominate far too much. Engines are only really viable with collusion / a sucker(s) willing to Produce or Ship for you. The extreme randomness of phase assignment eventually gets really, really annoying.
ale sa w watku komentarze, ze nie do konca tak jest:Riggah19 pisze: The main strategy is never invest in producing or shipping. If you are going to select a phase only choose 1, 2 or 3.
Explore is very useful to ensure you get your dice back in the cup. One or two times a game I will use all my dice (or as many as possible) on exploring. This way I can generate more money and get more dice back. Only a few times in a game will I explore to get more tiles. When I do explore to get tiles, I make sure I get multiple tiles.
Develop and Settle are very important. This is how I win. I develop and settle quickly enough that I have 12 developments/worlds. I develop/settle very quickly as that is all I am focused on. I also always develop/settle every tile I see that is a 6+, I never use the other side. The 6+ developments/worlds can generate a ton of victory points.
Co zatem myślą na temat regrywalności/balansu wersji podstawowej Ci z was, ktorzy mieli okazje pare razy juz w Rolla zagrac?Dulkal pisze:I think it speaks well of this games balance that we have threads arguing that shipping strategies never work, and threads arguing that the game is broken because shipping always wins.Octavian pisze:I suspect you're not committing to a shipping strategy and trying to make it a hybrid while also spending turns on settling and developing, etc. That's going to be a loser. If you get some early bonuses to ship you need to hammer produce/ship cycle hard. Ignore the rest. That's the path to a shipping victory.
The 6+ devs almost all come in at 12-18 points - the latter in ideal conditions. That's best case scenario of vp/die output, and requires finding the right dev and then meeting the conditions. Meanwhile, all those other planets and devs you are playing to meet those requirements are pulling down your vp/die average.
You can pretty easily match that overall vp/die average on every ship if you get the right ship powers and dice. And if you can speed up the game by exhausting the shipping vps you reduce the time that others have to find the 6+ devs they need, be able to develop them, and be able to meet all the requirements to max the bonus.
There are definitely so that can go much higher, but then you're not usually scoring big on multiple 6+s. And the average vp/die spent is going to obviously be lower than that max result from the 6+s.
mających czas, siłę i wolę ograć ją po sto i dwieście razy, to też nagle okazałoby się, iż gra IMHO w swym niezbalansowaniu bardzo zbalansowana jest słaba, bo "X grając Y zawsze wygrywa".
, to o wiele łatwiej nabrać na tyle doświadczenia, by później spędzać godziny na BGG dywagując czy ship/prod < dev/settle, czy może vice versa.
Z tego powodu, np. lubie testowac strategie w Dominionie przy pomocy symulatorow i grac Race'a z keldonem. Pytajac zatem o mozliwe strategie w Rollu tak naprawde chodzi mi o to, czy oprocz niewatpliwie milego aspektu turlania kosci (mam, gram i szanuje CoB, Bora Bora, Troyes) jest w Rollu to cos, co sprawia ze warto go miec *oprocz* Race'a arc1 - ktorego nigdy nie sprzedamrrenaud pisze: In general, I am a gamer who prefers depth over breadth. I'd rather play my 4000th game of Race for the Galaxy or my 4000th game of Dominion in place of learning a new game that is likely not as good. I think learning the boundaries of a game and playing nearly optimally with lots of experience is a lot more fun than learning some new set of rules or game mechanic.
To nie wspieraj, prostebartek_mi pisze:Wszyscy sie cieszą (i słusznie) z wydania PL a ja mam jak zwykle obawy o jakość tłumaczenia (i skład tekstu)...